Lamb, Meters. Elizabeth., & Gilbride, K. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you may incompatible matchmaking (pp. 33-60). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]
Lee, L., Loewenstein, Grams., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Young, J. (2008). In the event that I am not sensuous, are you beautiful or not?: Physical-attractiveness studies and you may matchmaking needs while the a purpose of one’s own appeal. Psychological Technology, 19, 669677. [ Hyperlinks ]
Levinger, Grams., & Rands, M. (1985)patibility in marriage and other close relationships. Inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you can in conflict dating (pp. 309-331). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]
Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Number of aspiration. Into the J. McV. Search (Ed.), Character while the conclusion disorders (Vol. step one, pp. 333378). Ny: Ronald Drive. [ Hyperlinks ]
Enjoying, T. J. (2006). Predicting matchmaking relationship destiny having insiders’ and you can outsiders’ perspective: Which and you may what is actually requested issues. Personal Relationship, thirteen, 349-362. [ Links ]
Luo, S., & Klohnen, E. C. (2005). Assortative mating and you will marital high quality into the newly wedded couples: Several centered approach. Log out of Character and you will Public Psychology, 88, 304-326. [ Hyperlinks ]
Lutz-Zois, C. J., Bradley, An excellent. C., Mihalik, J. L., & Moorman-Eavers, Age. R. (2006). Recognized similarity and relationship profits certainly relationship people: A keen idiographic approach. [ Website links ]
Madden, Yards., & Lenhart, A good. (2006). Dating. Washington, DC: Statement to the Pew Web sites & American Lifestyle Enterprise. Recovered , out of [ Links ]
MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, Meters. (1999). Assessing the precision away from forecasts about relationship matchmaking: How and exactly why do lovers’ forecasts range from men and women produced by perceiver? Identification and Personal Psychology Bulletin, twenty five, 14171429. [ Backlinks ]
ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing activities on initiation of heterosexual relationship. Paper showed during the First Around the globe Conference with the Private Dating, Madison, WI. [ Website links ]
Record out of Public and personal Matchmaking, 23, 865-880
Montoya, Roentgen. Yards., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Was actual similarity important for attraction? A great meta-study regarding real and thought similarity. Journal from Personal and private Matchmaking, 25, 889-922. [ Hyperlinks ]
Digital matchmaking and you may digital linked: Conceptualizing desktop mediated personal relationships
Morry, Meters. Meters. (2005). Relationships satisfaction while the a beneficial predictor regarding similarity product reviews; A test of destination-resemblance theory. Journal away from Personal and private Relationships, twenty-two, 561-584. [ Website links ]
Morry, Meters. Yards. (2007). The newest appeal-similarity theory one of cross-intercourse relatives: Dating satisfaction, observed similarities, and you may thinking-serving thinking. Log of Societal and personal Relationship, twenty-four, 117-138. [ Hyperlinks ]
Murstein, B. I. (1987). A clarification and extension of your SVR principle away from dyadic pairing. Record out of ily, 49, 929-947. [ Hyperlinks ]
Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who will divorce case: A great fourteen-12 months longitudinal examination of black people and you may light lovers. Log regarding Public and personal Matchmaking, 19, 179-202. [ Links ]
Orenstein, S. (). The fresh new love algorithm Match thinks it’s receive an algorithm getting governing the web based matchmaking business: A technical strategy to find Mr. or Ms. Best. Company dos.0 Mag. Recovered towards the out of [ Hyperlinks ]
Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Only the congruent endure – Identification parallels within the lovers. Identification and you will Individual Differences, forty-five, 533-535. [ Website links ]
Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, R. (2000). Partner preferences: What qualities do someone desire in their small-term sexual and you may enough time-title close couples? Diary out of Mindset and you can Peoples Sexuality, a dozen, 1-21. [ Website links ]
Reis, H. T. (1985). The role of one’s notice regarding initiation and you will span of societal communication. Within the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and incompatible relationships (pp. 209-231). Nyc: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]